China ‘Deepsek AI: DeepEep AI on the deesekeek AI on the question of the Government Censorship


The administrators being pretended as a technical marchese arrows to the freedom to speak in disagreement

Peaceing, January 29

Human rights activists have criticized the newly developed AI platforms of the China, the role of the role of the government, and the role of personal data collection of personal data. According to the Urgent Campaign (Campaign for uyoghur), even though it is being preached in a tech police, but despite it, the platform has come into the perception of criticism for important erlock and security issues.

The Urgent campaign highlighted that the Depsik agrees and stores and stores the latest information and conversation history on servers located in China. This has caused concerns about the potential abuse by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is known for the history of human rights. According to this issues being cenied issues like Urgeral, Tiananamin Chikk and issues like Tibetan movement.

The views of disagreements have also been accused of silence to silence, especially on the topics related to the state-related topics. It is being used as an instrument for the state / state of state.

Campaign Executive Director of Rushman for Executive Campaign (Rushan Abbas, Executive Director of the Campaign For Ulyghurs), “This is known for human rights violations, which are known for human rights violations Will benefit from. The Chinese AI platform and apps increase the risks including digital transmission of digital transmission. We can’t ignore it. “

Their statement emphasizes the rising concern over the risks produced by AI tools, which can facilitate sensorship and monitoring.

Similarly, a digital law expert living in Switzerland has shared his experience regarding Deepsek at X (X). “Deepsek may have an advanced success, but it is a main tool for Chinese preaching, but it may be a technical success.”

He said how he tried to force AI to force AI in Shinjiang under the International Law to accept the genocide and acceptance as crimes against the humanity. When he raised this issue repeatedly, AI stopped responding to the abruptly. Zarnaoki further said that AI responds to AI about Shinjiang was very highly script. He called it a “a execution of Chinese teaching ‘. -ENI

DeepSeek, China, Uyghur censorship, AI, propaganda, human rights, digital repression, privacy, Chinese Communist Party, Xinjiang



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *